That’s why the angry little Leftists who run Facebook are conspiring to defeat conservative “France First” presidential candidate Marine le Pen, a woman who is vying for the country’s top elected position.

And by the way, what happened to the Left’s war against the glass ceiling? Maybe it’s because France has had a female leader in the past. Surely that’s it.

Anyway, just as the social media giant pledged to prevent “fake news” from reaching its coveted News Feed here in the US – code for, ‘We don’t want any conservative media getting any attention because they are always right’ – now it’s working to “filter” French news feeds. (RELATED: When a lie becomes the narrative, it is covered at Propaganda.news)

As reported by The Verge, Facebook is “partnering” with “eight media fact-checkers” to ensure that any news regarding France’s upcoming presidential election is real:

According to Le Monde, one of Facebook’s partners, the French campaign is similar to an initiative that Facebook launched in the US late last year, and in Germany last month. Both Facebook and Google faced widespread criticism for allowing fake news to spread during the US presidential election, and European leaders have expressed concern that such misinformation could impact upcoming elections across the continent.

If users report news as “fake,” those stories get sent to a single portal that all eight news organizations and fact-checking groups can access. Once there, they get to decide what is and is not real; if at least two media outlets proclaim it to be false, then the story gets flagged, and users will be treated to a warning by Facebook that hey, this stuff is made up.

Only, as has been pointed out since Facebook first announced its post-election effort to weed out “fake news” from U.S. media sources, the real fake news has been coming primarily from so-called “mainstream” outlets like CNN, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Buzzfeed and others.

There are other ways these outlets are spreading fake information. For instance, President Donald Trump’s executive order banning travel into the United States from seven terrorism-infested countries is being portrayed as some sort of an attack on Islam. This Bloomberg View piece is typical:

President Donald Trump’s executive order barring the U.S. entry of refugees from seven majority-Muslim countries — while prioritizing refugees who are religious minorities, namely Christians — is a shameful display of discrimination against people who are by legal definition innocent and in danger of their lives. It also violates the constitutional value of equal religious liberty.

Trump is not saying every Muslim is a terrorist; but his order, like President Obama’s before him, does acknowledge that Muslim countries have a big problem with creating terrorists.

Another recently-begun false narrative is that Trump’s first Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, is filling a “stolen seat,” as reported by MediaFactWatch.com. The site notes that the Left’s bible, The New York Times, says the seat was “stolen” by the Senate Republican majority because it refused to hold hearings on Merrick Garland, a liberal-leaning U.S. District Appeals Court judge who, if confirmed, would have given the nation’s highest court a distinct anti-constitutional Left-wing bent. (RELATED: See what the mainstream media is lying about today at NewsFakes.com)

The thing is, the Senate, per the Constitution, gives its “advice and consent” of a president’s judicial nominees – but it doesn’t have to give it. There is no constitutional requirement that the Senate vet any presidential nominee, let alone give consent.

But that story, because it’s coming from the Times, would make it into the Facebook feed. Ditto for similar fake news from the rest of the establishment “mainstream” media, which churns out a steady stream of shameless disinfo.

In France, as in the U.S., Facebook users will now be treated to a steady diet of “news” that contains a singular anti-conservative, globalist view, which is not freedom but a form of soft tyranny and censorship. Le Pen may just overcome this bias anyway, just like Trump did.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for Natural News and News Target, as well as editor of The National Sentinel

Sources:

NYTimes.com

MediaFactWatch.com

Bloomberg.com

TheVerge.com

TruthWiki.org

(Article by Nicholas Fondacaro from Newsbusters.org)

Fischer defended the President, saying that it’s his job to foster relationships with leaders from countries around the globe. “And I believe that President Trump will recognize, or does recognize right now, who Putin is,” she added in his defense.

But Tur wasn’t having any of it, pressuring the Senator by asking, “What makes you say that he does recognize who Putin is when he hasn’t said so publicly?” The Senator tried to argue that the new president wasn’t going to sour the relationship right out of the gate, but was cut off by her interviewer. “There is a difference between attacking and flattering,” Tur spat.

The Senator tried to put Tur’s worries about Trump’s handling of Putin to rest, stating that Trump “will have very firm, very harsh, if need be, conversations with Putin…” And that the United States would not allow Putin to “re-establish some kind of empire for himself…”

Tur scoffed at the idea that our allies would be reassured by the Trump White House. “We will see if they are convinced by that,” she said dismissively.

NBC has demonstrated a blatant willingness to ignore Trump’s toughness on Russia and mischaracterize his understanding of the Russian tyrant. Tur claimed Trump was “going above and beyond — bending over backwards” for the Russian president. But these are the same people who blacked-out how the administration stood up to Russia during UN Security Council meeting last week.

And to suggest that Trump would follow Putin down a “dangerous path” and start assassinating journalist is vile. It’s reporting like this that helps to create the circumstances for the violent rhetoric we’re seeing from the left, such as Madonna talking about blowing up the White House and Sarah Silverman calling for a military coup.

Transcript below:

MSNBC Live
February 6, 2017
2:31:25 PM Eastern

KATY TUR: Senator, the junior senator in your state, Senator Ben Sasse, came out pretty strongly over the weekend condemning Donald Trump’s assertion that we are just as bad as Russia. When he said that, you know, we — America does bad and terrible things, too, when Bill O’Reilly asked him if Vladimir Putin was a killer.

Why — what is your sense of why this president is going above and beyond — bending over backwards, if you will — to stay away from criticizing the Russian president? And it’s almost give him an excuse. As we know, there’s, since 2000, been a couple dozen suspicious deaths of journalists in Russia who came out against the government there. Donald Trump has made no secret about going after journalists and his distaste for any news that doesn’t agree with him here. Do you find that this is a dangerous path he is heading down?

DEB FISCHER: I know that Putin is a thug and he runs a gas station, and the prices are low right now. And so he is going to continue to be belligerent; he is going to continue to be aggressive. I’ve led a codels to Eastern Europe; I led a codel to Estonia, the Czech Republic, and Romania. And we have a very full understanding of who Vladimir Putin is. And he is not a friend of the United States.

It’s up to President Trump to establish relationships with foreign leaders, but also to recognize them for who they are. And I believe that President Trump will recognize, or does recognize right now, who Putin is. And he will develop that relationship and he will know how to confront him.

TUR: Very quickly, what makes you say that he does recognize who Putin is when he hasn’t said so publicly?

FISCHER: Well, I think when you’re at the beginning of an administration, you really don’t want to go out and start attacking people that you’re going to have to work with. You know when I came to the United States —

TUR [over Fischer]: There is a difference between attacking and flattering.

FISCHER: Well, when I came to the United States Senate, I told Nebraskans I was going to work across the aisle. You know, I’m going to work with Republicans, I’m going to work with Democrats. We have differing opinions on many things but we have to work together. And I’m not going to attack them in public. We’re going to try to get together. I think it’s important that we show that we can work together. We can be respectful. We can be civil. And the American people need to see that. So, I am hopeful that President Trump will have very firm, very harsh, if need be, conversations with Putin to let him know that here in the United States we understand who he is, we understand what we view as his agenda in trying to re-establish some kind of empire for himself, and that we will not allow that to happen. Our allies need to hear that. And I think here in the Senate, many of us have been very, very forthright in making sure that our allies understand that we are there for them against Putin.

TUR: We will see if they are convinced by that.

Read more at: Newsbusters.org

Almost no media outlets in the United States even mentioned the alarming news, either. As The Guardian reports, radiation levels have reach what experts call an “unimaginable” intensity inside the containment structure of reactor No. 2, clocking in at 530 sieverts per hour.

A sievert is a unit of radiation exposure, and exposure to just five sieverts in a short amount of time has a 50% kill rate among humans. When it comes to radiation exposure, the intensity of the exposure (which is the inverse of the duration of exposure) matters a lot. Absorbing five sieverts of radiation over a year’s time is not fatal, but exposure to five sieverts in just 60 seconds, for example, will almost certainly kill you from radiation poisoning (it’s a miserable way to die, by the way).

The level of radiation measured inside Fukushima reactor No. 2 is 530 sieverts per hour, or over 100 times the intensity necessary to kill most humans who are exposed for just a short time.

The melted fuel rods which are generating this radiation have apparently bored a hole through the floor of the containment vessel, meaning they may be very close to coming into contact with ground water or ocean water (or may have already struck it). Melting fuel rods also vastly increases the risk of nuclear fuel criticality which could “explode” the deadly radioactive elements into the open atmosphere. Yet nearly the entire mainstream media remains in a complete news blackout over this devastating development that threatens the sustainability of all life in the Northern hemisphere.

I guess talking about Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban” (which isn’t even a ban on Muslims) is far more important than… I don’t know… surviving the world’s worst nuclear meltdown that’s nowhere close to being resolved.

The same media that called “meltdown” a conspiracy theory now report it as a casual fact

Check out this paragraph from The Guardian, which casually admits the Fukushima facility suffered a “meltdown”:

The facility’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), said atmospheric readings as high as 530 sieverts an hour had been recorded inside the containment vessel of reactor No 2, one of three reactors that experienced a meltdown when the plant was crippled by a huge tsunami that struck the north-east coast of Japan in March 2011.

The reason I point this out is because back in 2011, when the entire independent media was sounding the alarm about the fuel meltdown that had obviously taken place, we were all called “conspiracy kooks” by the lying mainstream media. Also recall that in 2011, most people had not yet learned that the mainstream media is FAKE NEWS, so they believed whatever CNN was telling them. “Don’t worry, it’s not a meltdown. It’s all under control. Fukushima is no big deal, don’t listen to the alarmists.”

Now, it’s almost six years later. Fukushima’s melted fuel rods are obviously not just continuing to pump out radiation — because you cannot change the laws of physics — but something has caused the intensity of the radiation output to suddenly escalate to insane levels. Possible explanations for this include, of course, more fuel rods being exposed or fuel rods coming into closer contact with each other, amplifying and accelerating the mass-to-energy conversion.

The world’s largest “dirty bomb” just waiting to explode

In effect, Fukushima has become the world’s largest dirty bomb, and the remaining fuel rods could explode (achieve criticality) at any moment. Even right now, the radiation is so intense that robots built to explore the wreckage can only survive for a few hours before their circuits are destroyed. Thus, there’s almost no scenario in which Japan, Tepco or anybody in the world figures out how to clean up the wreckage, reclaim the melting fuel rods and reestablish control over the nuclear reactions that are still ongoing.

You can’t even successfully build a containment vessel on top of it all because the melting nuclear fuel has already burned a massive hole in the floor and is melting its way into the ground water.

“Tepco also said image analysis had revealed a hole in metal grating beneath the same reactor’s pressure vessel,” reports The Guardian. “The one-metre-wide hole was probably created by nuclear fuel that melted and then penetrated the vessel after the tsunami knocked out Fukushima Daiichi’s back-up cooling system.”

Gee, ya think? I love how Tepco and the world’s excuse-making media has been lying about Fukushima for so long that the truth still manages to escape them. Do they think a one-meter hole magically appears in nuclear containment vessels due to random chance? No, it’s melting fuel rods, you morons. And some of that fuel is MOX fuel, which contains plutonium-239 that boasts a half life of 24,000 years. So sometime in the year 26000 A.D. the Fukushima nightmare will be HALF as toxic as it is right now. What a wonderful, progressive future to look forward to, eh? (RELATED: Find more uncensored truth about everything at TRUTH.news)

That’s how stupid modern humans have become. They aren’t just destroying life in the now; they’re poisoning the planet for the next half a million years and calling it “green energy.” Yeah, and biosolids are green fertilizer, right?

Given the potential for the mass poisoning of the northern hemisphere for the next half a million years, what exactly is the Japanese government’s plan for Fukushima? Keep lying as long as possible and hope nobody notices. (That’s also the basic plan of the mainstream media in the United States, which is now populated almost exclusively by brain-damaged idiots who suck down fluoride and mercury flu shots to keep their brains stupid enough to read the teleprompters.)

The radiation fries the robots in two hours… somebody call Superman!

“A remote-controlled robot that Tepco intends to send into the No 2 reactor’s containment vessel is designed to withstand exposure to a total of 1,000 sieverts, meaning it would survive for less than two hours before malfunctioning,” adds The Guardian.

Robots are f##ked, in other words. Unless you know how to build a radiation-proof robot, there’s really no solution found in robotics.

Humans are almost instantly killed in an environment of 500+ sieverts / hour. It’s basically like shoving your head into a network of 50,000 microwave ovens all set to “FRY” … without wearing sunscreen.

The only solution to all this, it turns out, is something that doesn’t exist: Superman. Essentially, Tepco needs Superman to pull the fuel out of reactor No. 2. He can pull it off because, thankfully, Fukushima fuel rods aren’t made from Kryptonite.

The problem with this solution, of course, is that Superman is a fictional superhero, not an actual person. I fully realize that fiction never gets in the way of fake science when it comes to covering the ass of the nuclear energy industry — nor even the vaccine industry for that matter — but in this case, we can’t solve a REAL problem with an imaginary superhero.

Here’s how The Guardian waters down this problem and makes it sound like a mild challenge rather than the nuclear holocaust it may actually become:

Tepco and its network of partner companies at Fukushima Daiichi have yet to identify the location and condition of melted fuel in the three most seriously damaged reactors. Removing it safely represents a challenge unprecedented in the history of nuclear power.

So wait a second. SIX YEARS into Fukushima, the Tepco company still can’t find the “location and condition of melted fuel” in three of the reactors? (Please beat your head against the wall right now, then return to this article. It’s the only way to hammer the “crazy” out of your consciousness.)

No, seriously. We are six years into this disaster. They still can’t find the fuel rods. There’s a one-meter hole burned in the floor. The radiation levels are skyrocketing to “unimaginable” intensity. The robots get fried in two hours. Humans are killed almost instantly…

From that, The Guardian concludes that the situation “represents a challenge unprecedented in the history of nuclear power.”

I would say it’s way more than a “challenge.” It’s basically FukuPocalypse. No one has a solution because there apparently isn’t one.

But wait, CLIMATE CHANGE is going to doom our civilization, right?

Yet the entire blabbering, idiotic media puppets drone on endlessly about the imminent threat of “climate change” — the greatest quack science hoax and glorious disinformation theatrics ever pulled off in the history of our world. According to the climate change lunatics, ocean levels are going to rise over a few hundred years and might cause some coastal cities like New York to be under a couple of feet of water. Wow. That’s the crisis? Really?

Meanwhile, Fukushima is about to go supercritical, spewing MOX dirty bomb radiation with a half life of 24,000 years across the entire northern hemisphere… yet there isn’t a peep about it from the news morons.

Climate change is totally made up. Fukushima is REAL.

Climate change is based on flawed computer models which are themselves based on flawed assumptions. Fukushima is based on the laws of physics and cannot be stopped by legislation or wishful thinking.

Climate change says that carbon dioxide — an essential molecule for plant respiration — is evil and deadly. Yet covering up the truth about Fukushima denies the fact that Plutonium-239 is a billion times more dangerous than CO2, even at far lower concentrations in the atmosphere.

Somehow, you are being told to be alarmed, horrified and freaked out by a non-emergency (climate change) while remaining completely apathetic about an actual, real emergency (Fukushima).

We are all trapped in a planet-wide SUICIDE CULT run by incompetent morons

It is at moments like this that I seriously feel like humanity has become a planet-wide suicide cult run by incompetent morons. If they all want to drink the Kool-Aid, that’s their choice, but I would prefer they don’t take me with them. For my part, I would actually like to live on a planet that isn’t contaminated and condemned by plutonium-239, cesium-137 and strontium-90.

According to the insanely stupid mainstream media, that somehow makes me crazy. But you and I both know that conforming to the stupidity of the delusional masses has never been a measure of sanity.

Stay informed on all this at FukushimaWatch.com and RadiationScience.com. And don’t believe a word of anything you read in the “fake news” mainstream media.

Read the intro here and watch the video below. Via SHTFplan.com:

The most oft cited reason by opponents of President Trump’s immigration policies for why America should open its borders to the millions of impoverished and persecuted individuals around the world often center around humanitarian reasons. As a rich country with plenty of land mass, we should be able to take in anyone and everyone who may be in need, right?

While that notion, like Marx-Engels’ ideas for taking from those who have the ability and giving to those who need, may seem great on paper, successfully implementing such policies in the real world is starkly different.

According to Census Bureau statistics, some 1.3 million foreign-born individuals legally immigrated to the United States in 2014. That figure doesn’t include the nearly one million immigrants that enter the country illegally each year. Those who support open border immigration have said that we need to take in even more people.

But according to journalist Roy Beck, taking in one million people per year makes almost no difference in the grand scheme of things because for every million we bring into the United States, another 80 million people yearly are born into countries with extreme levels of poverty, violence or war. According to Beck, even opening our borders to five million more people per year would do nothing to stem the the real problems.

In what is one of the most viewed immigration policy videos on the internet from Numbers USA, Beck ingeniously utilizes gumballs to demonstrate why open borders simply will not work. As well, he provides a seemingly novel solution that has for decades fallen on deaf ears:

We never get ahead of what’s happening in these countries… Don’t you see? Immigration can never be an effective or significant way to deal with the suffering people of the world… they have to be helped where they live…

99.9% of them will never be able to immigrate to a rich country… there is no hope for that… they have to bloom where they’re planted… the only place that 99.9% of these people can be helped is where they live… let’s help them there.

In short: taking in millions of immigrants doesn’t even make a dent.

So for those utilizing immigration as justification for violent protests and kinetic civil war, or for those who follow such narratives blindly based strictly on emotions that are devoid of any rational thought, we encourage you to consider the reality of bringing in millions of immigrants from impoverished countries.

And don’t just consider the non-effect of such policies as they relate to the global humanitarian situation, but consider the implications this has on America’s resources, as well as our citizens, who will be burdened with heavy taxation to cover the costs.

Even if we went by the most radical proposals in Washington, which are to actually double our immigration to two million year… which would totally overwhelm our physical, natural and social infrastructures, we couldn’t even make a visible difference.

Read more at SHTFplan.com

Founder of Media Matters, David Brock, still blames the fake news for defeating Hillary Clinton in the election. The Left-Wing views anything that doesn’t fit their narrative as fake news. They wish to eradicate stories that expose their fraudulent behavior and make you conform to their beliefs. Facebook has essentially outstretched its means and gone rogue. Social media loses it’s definition when it’s not unbiased and uncensored. (RELATED: Find more Hillary Clinton news at Clinton.news)

Media Matters proclaims itself to be the top watchdog against fake news and propaganda, but they’re heavily biased towards helping the left-wing’s political agenda. Media Matters aims to ensure that companies like Google and Facebook’s websites don’t host and help fake news and propaganda, but that determining that is subject to their discretion.

Google has revised their terms of service to prohibit advertising from many news sites deemed fake by leftists. Media Matters are the ones who identified the “40 worst fake news sites” that applied to Google’s policy revision.

Media Matters will now help Facebook adjust their model to curb damaging news for left-wing’s causes. The left is taking rather large steps to suppress the angles that aren’t beneficial to them. Media Matters mentioned in a statement that they pressured Facebook during the election season to focus on what they believed to be fake news circulating around on social media.

Media Matters said it was clear that Facebook needed their help to understand the fake news problem and conjure up possible solutions. Media Matters is using the financial support of donors to tackle its mission. Unfortunately, left-wing interests are the financial backers of Media Matters.

Sources:

FreeBeacon.com

Breitbart.com

The hijacking of news by special interests — and especially medical news — is hardly new. But the great disservice that it has done to the people of not only the United States but everywhere else that censorship has prevailed, is largely underestimated. For probably the last 100 years, medicine and the advancements surrounding it have served a sinister agenda that, far from helping people achieve true health, has harmed and killed millions upon millions of people through the printing of “fake science” medical news.

When powerful interests began to invade medical schools and change their curricula right around the turn of the 20th century is when things really went south. Doctors began to treat symptoms rather than copiously search for the root causes of illness in order to facilitate their proper healing. Medicine switched from a system that embraced comprehensive immune support to one where pharmaceutical drugs became the answer to everything — much to detriment of public health.

Vaccines and pharmaceuticals have replaced sound nutrition and common sense sanitation and hygiene. The average person knows next to nothing about which foods and herbs might naturally help him or her avoid disease but likely knows that popping an aspirin will relieve that nagging headache. And perhaps the biggest culprit driving this mass ignorance is the media, which has been complicit in hiding the truth from people for many decades.

Worse than terrorism: American medicine kills at least 225,000 people annually

Investigative journalist Jon Rappoport is all-too-familiar with media censorship, having withdrawn from its clutches back in the 1980s when he first observed what was going on. In the arena of vaccines, for instance, Rappoport recognized that stimulating the immune system to produce antibodies is not a reliable indicator that someone is immune from a disease, as antibodies also show up when a person is diagnosed with a disease — how reliable is that?

Or, what about our system of medicine as a whole, which a prominent science paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) back in 2000 revealed is responsible for killing at least 225,000 people living in the U.S. every single year? Mainstream medicine is so harmful, in fact, that statistics now show it to be the third leading cause of death in the U.S., behind heart disease and cancer. (Learn more truths about modern medicine at Medicine.news.)

It is a matter of fact that 2.1 million people in the U.S. are hospitalized every single year due to reactions or side effects from medications that have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In total, 36 million Americans suffer adverse reactions to FDA-approved drugs every year, and yet you will rarely hear a peep from the media about this serious epidemic.

Everything from the way certain diseases are diagnosed to the way they are treated is a byproduct of a failed system that, thanks in large part to cowardly journalists who refuse to take a stand, is only continuing to consolidate power and bring more death and destruction to our planet.

Rappoport is smart: he got out while he could and has since made a name for himself as a brave, truth-telling journalist with high rapport in truth-telling circles. But many others outside the fold — some of whom know the truth but refuse to tell it for whatever reason — continue to tow the line, at the expense of untold millions of lives.

Sources:

WakingTimes.com

JHSPH.edu

For instance, Pollack noted that Jesse Arreguin, the mayor of Berkeley, just another far-Left city in far-Left California, tweeted that Milo’s “hate speech” and as such would not be “welcome” in the city. This tweet was accompanied by the familiar charges of “bigotry” and that the community would not tolerate being “marginalized” by one man who has a different political viewpoint. A viewpoint, of course, he was unable to share on the intolerant Berkeley campus.

That’s how the Left works: Its adherents self-define their political enemies, then use the same tactics they accuse the enemy of using to shut them down. And when they can’t shame conservatives into silence, they attempt to beat or intimidate them into it. (RELATED: Conservatives won’t be silenced and you can read all about it at Conservative.news)

About that violence, it is also being accompanied by another familiar scene: That of local police standing idly by while innocent people are verbally and physically attacked. At Berkeley this week, one woman was sprayed with pepper spray; one man was beaten unconscious by domestic terrorists using steel rods.

Police response? As Pollack wrote:

Were these groups merely showing up at events to protest — to express their views without silencing others — they would be perfectly entitled to do so. But lately, they have taken advantage of the timidity of the police — which they helped engineer, through their participation in the Black Lives Matter movement — to run amok, breaking up events and assaulting innocent people in full view of law enforcement officers and even the media. They are almost never pursued and never punished.

He noted further that the Berkeley newspaper, the Daily Californian, reported that just three people were arrested: Two in connection with violence they had committed earlier in the day and only one person at the protest, despite a night of injury, mayhem and property destruction.

That’s absurd, and it’s a travesty, quite frankly. As noted by The National Sentinel, at what point do innocents who are being victimized for attempting to exercise their First Amendment rights get to expect that police will protect them? Is it going to take more people being beaten? Is it going to take people being killed before cops will act? (RELATED: What has the insane Left done to academia today? Find out at CampusInsanity.com)

Because here’s the problem we face, if this kind of Alt-Left violence is allowed to continue unchecked: Sooner or later, counter-groups will begin to show up at these events, ready to battle the Alt-Left terrorists. And what we’ll have then is an all-out war in our streets and on our institutes of higher learning.

If these assaults were taking place outside the realm of a “demonstration” the offenders would surely be arrested and charged with a crime. So what makes violence at political events any different, any less of an assault and battery? If anything, such politically motivated attacks ought to carry stiffer penalties because they are assaults on our constitutional founding.

Is that what idiot mayors like Arreguin want?

Actually, yes. It’s all part of the “revolution” – the far-Left movement to replace constitutional government with tyranny. Under the guise of ‘fighting the good fight,’ the angry Left is using the cover of political discourse to impose its will on the rest of the country, no matter what the results were of our last round of elections.

But at some point, the right will push back. It’s inevitable; more Americans stand for the law and order that President Trump and conservatives represent than the violent despotism of the Left.

In a recent podcast, Natural News founder/editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, notes that what Milo is brilliantly doing is provoking Leftists into revealing who they really are: Insane, violent, anti-law, anti-free speech communist haters. Listen to the podcast here.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for Natural News and News Target, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources:

Breitbart.com

TheNationalSentinel.com

Terrorism.news

GoodGopher.com

As you’re likely aware by now, domestic terrorists – let’s not call them “protesters” because that’s not what they are – shut down a planned event featuring Trump supporter and Breitbart senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos, setting fires, smashing windows, and using steel pipes to beat several people before police moved in.

However, the terrorism didn’t end there, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle:

But even after the event’s cancellation, hundreds of protesters spilled off campus into the city streets, where the violence continued as they confronted drivers, engaged in fights, smashed storefront windows and set fires.

In the past, such terrorism has been staged by groups funded by billionaire anarchist George Soros, a Nazi collaborator who has literally taken over the Democratic Party. What’s more, Democrats don’t seem to mind; while they compare Trump to a Nazi, Democratic leaders are in bed with someone who actually helped them. (RELATED: Keep track of who’s behind the collapse of our society at Terrorism.news)

As noted by the Gateway Pundit, Soros’ filthy hands are all over the anti-Trump, anti-GOP violence in recent months:

A week before last Soros was reported as being behind 50 Groups involved in the ‘Women’s Protests’ the day after the inauguration.

Before that Soros groups were reportedly being used by social media giants to combat ‘Fake News’. These groups will use the Soros funded website Snopes which is notorious for its far left leaning positions on all issues related to politics. The result of these efforts will be more far left news supported by the Nazi collaborator.

Before this, Soros was connected to the groups demanding the recounts after the November 8th election.  And at about the same time, Soros money was funding protests shortly after the election results were official.

Then, of course, there is the pathetic, co-conspirator media, which gives a platform to left-wing hate-mongers spewing all kinds of crazy, disgusting things that, were Barack Obama still in office, would have been treated as nothing less than treason (and why isn’t he speaking out against all of this violence?).

For instance, little-watched MSNBC put Hillary Clinton’s vice presidential pick, Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, on the air and let him say this, unchallenged, about the Democratic anti-Trump “strategy” moving forward:

What we’ve got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there’s the momentum to be able to do this. And we’re not afraid of the popular outcry, we’re energized by it and that’s going to help us do our job and do it better.

Then, Foreign Policy published this unhinged screed from a former State Department “senior advisor,” Rosa Brooks, who actually suggested a military coup to remove Trump from office. Claiming Trump is “crazy,” she implores us to read the 25^th Amendment to the Constitution, which gives instruction on how to remove a president from office that has been deemed unfit.

And why is Trump unfit? Because the angry Left has proclaimed it so! And just look at what he’s doing to the country!

Who’s the real lunatic here? I say it’s a former government “advisor” who recommends the military overthrow a duly elected U.S. president, as if we were a banana republic. (RELATED: The angry Left won’t stop until the civil society is destroyed – stay tuned at Collapse.news)

That any media outlet would even give someone a platform to suggest war in the streets and a military coup to remove our president proves once again that journo-terrorists are working hand in hand with actual terrorists funded by a real Nazi sympathizer to destroy civil rights.

Here is what the “tolerant” Left is really like:

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for Natural News and News Target, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

ForeignPolicy.com

Breitbart.com

TheNationalSentinel.com

GoodGopher.com

Many people on the left-wing are speaking out about the attacks, but not in the manner you would expect; they are standing up for the attackers. The haters are saying they don’t condone hate speech, including Berkeley’s mayor who condoned the riots as a reaction to hate speech. If only they could realize how hypocritical they are. The mainstream media have been legitimizing these anti-right wing demonstrations for almost two years. (RELATED: Find real news headlines hourly at Censored.news)

The media are complicit when they label the violent riots as just protests and further downplay the severity when the right is attacked. What would the left-wing owned media stories look like if the situation was inverted at Hillary Clinton’s commencement address at Wellesley College? That would have also been blamed on right wing bigotry, homophobia, and racism. There’s no winning against the leftist media who continue to warp the minds of Americans into standing up for corrupt globalist interests. (RELATED: Read MediaFactWatch.com for more news about the lying left-wing media.)

Donald Trump responded to the recent riots with a threat to cease federal funding to the university. A statement from UC Berkeley condemned both Milo’s presence at the university and his perspectives. They called him a troll and provocateur who aims hate speech at a wide array of groups and individuals. The university is essentially blaming Milo’s opinions and behavior for the violent displays against Trump supporters. The worst part is that many people don’t know or understand what types of discussions actually take place at a Milo event, they just know they oppose him because the media tells them to.

If you don’t like Milo, the simple solution is to not show up at his events. The attacks went far beyond just Milo; Trump supporters were the prime targets for the rioters. If only the left-wing supporters could realize the façade they are fighting for is ultimately designed to work against them. If funding terrorists, depopulating the planet, and being enslaved by a one-world government sounds appealing to you, then keep on rioting. The media will continue to stand against Donald Trump and his supporters every at every chance possible. (RELATED: Find more Donald Trump news at Trump.news)

Sources:

InfoWars.com

Breitbart.com

Agence France Press ran a story a few days ago that is long on claims and short on facts. For instance, the story claimed that Mexicans:

— Are angry about President Donald Trump’s insistence that their country pay for the border wall;

— Are set in mass numbers to boycott American products and brands (the story mentioned three: Starbucks, McDonald’s, and Coca-Cola);

— Are using pro-Mexico hashtags all over social media.

The story appears to be the latest attempt by the media to make Mexico appear as though it is being victimized by the Trump administration and has to “fight back.” But the reality is just the opposite, as usual. (RELATED: How is the media failing you today? Discover the truth at MediaFactWatch.com)

As reported by SHTFPlan.com, if anyone should be worried, it’s Americans, making it even more necessary than ever to have that border wall Trump has set in motion.

Much of Mexico is ungovernable, and that is due in large part to the heavy presence and influence of the country’s large and dangerous drug cartels. Many of them wield more firepower than many Mexican army units and they have more cash at their disposal than entire states. One former Mexican foreign affairs secretary, Jorge Castañeda Gutman, has all but threatened they would be unleashed on the American public if Trump doesn’t back down from his pledges.

In an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, an accused serial plagiarist, Gutman hinted that his country’s so-called drug enforcement assistance to the U.S. might not only be pulled, but the cartels might actually be turned on our country.

“Mexico has a lot of negotiating chips in this matter, Fareed, but it also has measures we could take in other areas,” he said, as quoted by STHFPlan.com. “For example, the drugs that come through Mexico from South America, or the drugs that are produced here in Mexico all go to the United States. This is not our problem. We have been cooperating with the United States for many years on these issues because they’ve asked us to and because we have a friendly, trustful relationship. If that relationship disappears, the reasons for cooperation also disappear.”

Did Gutman just threaten to export Mexico’s drug violence to the United States, as it has been exporting its poverty and criminals for decades? Some would certainly view it as a threat, and they’d be right.

There’s little question that the Mexican government has long been infested with officials and mid-level careerists who are owned and operated by the cartels. Graft and corruption is rampant in Mexico. The Los Angeles Times reported in 2008 that then-Mexican President Felipe Calderon said his government was making a bit of progress in battling the cartels but “that graft remained a threat to the nation’s efforts against crime.”

The paper noted further:

Mexico has long been rife with corruption, which ranges from the small bribes that motorists pay traffic officers to the suitcases of cash that drug traffickers have delivered to law enforcement authorities. Ordinary Mexicans routinely pay bribes to get telephone service, loans, and even parking spaces.

Little changed in the ensuing years, except maybe that cartel violence only got worse. As Breitbart reported in December 2015, that year was “filled with drug violence, controversy, and crime.” In fact, rather than see decreases, “the country has begun to see escalating violence in places previously untouched.” (RELATED: Keep up with all of the threats to American society at Collapse.news)

Drug cartels regularly gun down scores of rivals, kill local officials who refuse to be bribed, behead victims, and fill mass graves. And now, at least one former Mexican official wants to see the same thing happen in American cities.

It’s not hard to understand why Mexican officials are petrified that the Trump administration is going to make good on its promises to build a wall (on Mexico’s peso), and crack down on border security: Once those two things happen, it will be much more difficult for the country to export it’s social ills.

But given Gutman’s not-so-veiled warning, it’s just further justification for Trump to keep his campaign promise to keep Americans safe.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for Natural News and News Target, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources:

Breitbart.com

LATimes.com

SHTFPlan.com

Yahoo.com (Agence France Presse)

GoodGopher.com